12 complete symptom paths42 guides and 60 questions in each1,460 Grade A articlesOne searchable, connected knowledge library140 official sourcesEvidence context with explicit limits
Materials · moisture layer

Efflorescence: deposit location versus water route

White mineral deposits mark where water evaporated; they do not identify the original source without the surrounding moisture pattern.

Original explanatory diagramNot a site photograph
Efflorescence: deposit location versus water routeWhite mineral deposits mark where water evaporated; they do not identify the original source without the surrounding moisture pattern. Original explanatory diagram, not a site photograph.01Water enters masonry02Dissolved salts move03Evaporation leaves crystals04Dry intact surface05Source may be elsewhere

Diagram coordinates are explanatory, not measurements. Confirm the actual assembly before opening, testing or repairing it.

Expected pathway

Dry masonry surface

The assembly remains dry enough that dissolved salts are not repeatedly transported to the surface.

Failure pathway

Salt transport and evaporation

Water dissolves salts inside masonry, moves toward the drying surface and leaves crystals as it evaporates.

Trigger that matters

Watch the conditions

Deposit height, rainfall and whether the crystals return after cleaning reveal the active route.

Reasoning guardrail

Do not assume

White powder is not automatically mold, and cleaning it does not stop the water pathway.

Field clues

Look for

  • Low horizontal band
  • Defined crack line
  • Deposit below a concentrated exterior discharge
Evidence Pathway

Keep competing explanations alive.

Map deposit height, weather exposure, first damp edge and drying direction. Photograph before cleaning so the exit pattern is preserved.

Hypothesis 1

Ground or foundation moisture moving by capillarity

Moisture rises through porous masonry and leaves salts where evaporation occurs.

Raises fit
  • Lower-wall concentration
  • Persistent ground moisture
  • Broad horizontal band
Lowers fit
  • Deposit starts below a local pipe or penetration
Hypothesis 2

Rain entry through exterior masonry or joints

Wind-driven rain enters higher on the wall and exits at an interior evaporation zone.

Raises fit
  • Weather and wind dependence
  • Higher or localized pattern
  • Exterior joint defects
Lowers fit
  • No rain relationship and strong lower-wall band
Hypothesis 3

Local service water source

A pipe or condensate route feeds one masonry area and produces a concentrated salt deposit.

Raises fit
  • Localized pattern near services
  • Dry-weather recurrence
  • Water-use or equipment relationship
Lowers fit
  • Broad seasonal ground pattern
Decision points

Change one condition at a time.

Each answer changes the investigation order. It does not prove a hidden condition by itself.

1

Is the deposit a broad lower-wall band or a concentrated higher patch?

If yes: A lower band supports ground moisture; a high patch supports local or rain entry.

If no: Map the first damp edge during an active event.

2

Does the pattern change after rain or during dry-weather service use?

If yes: Use the trigger to separate exterior and interior sources.

If no: Continue long-term moisture mapping before repair.

Evidence before repair

Next checks

Use the smallest safe observation that can separate the competing routes.

1

Dry-brush a small sample

Mineral deposits are usually dry and crystalline; avoid creating airborne dust.

2

Map recurrence

Photograph the cleaned area and record how quickly the deposit returns.

3

Trace exterior loading

Inspect grade, downspouts and cracks aligned with the deposit.